Part-I
1.0. About
Children’s Science Congress (CSC )
1.1.
CSC
– the beginning
The seeds of the programme
of children’s science congress (CSC ),
in the way of an exercise to carry out small research activities at micro-level
were planted in Madhya Pradesh by an NGO called Gwalior Science
Center DST ),
Government of India for carrying out national level activities through NCSTC-Network
(a network of Non-Government and Government organizations working in the field
of science popularization) as national organiser. It was a time when many of
the country’s crusaders of science communication were experienced with massive
science communication exercise of Bharat Jana Bigyan Jatha and Bharat
Jana Gyan Bigyan Jatha. It was felt that the large scale activities for
developing scientific awareness among the masses are to be continued as regular
activity, so, this programme was launched nationwide in 1993, under the
nomenclature of National Children’s Science Congress (NCSC), with an
expectation that it would generate scientific temperament among the teachers
and students, and spread among various stakeholders of the society. The
programme of NCSC has been fruitfully conducted for the last 19 years.
1.2.
CSC
– an overview
Children’s Science Congress
is targeted to spread the concept of the method of science among the children
through their project activities adopting the principle of ‘Learning through
doing’. The mandate of participation is that, the children will carry out a
project on a particular topic in relation to theme and sub-theme decided for
the year. The study is to be carried out in the neighbourhood of the children
where they live in. For this, the students form a group with their like-minded
friends/classmates and the study is carried out under the supervision of a
guide. It is noteworthy that, CSC
programme is not only for the school going children but is also open for the
children outside the formal boundary of schools, in the age group of 10 to 17
years (where 10 to 14 years is considered as junior group and 14 to 17 years as
senior group). Further, it is not mandatory that a guide must be a school
teacher; any person with fair knowledge of dealing with children and method of
science is considered eligible to guide the children.
The exercises of project
activities, as a thumb rule, encourage the children to explore, think,
serve and wonder. It is capable to imbibe the following
temperament/quality/skill of the children:
·
Observation,
·
Making measurement,
·
Making comparison and
contrasts,
·
Classification,
·
Estimation,
·
Prediction,
·
Interpretation,
·
Critical thinking,
·
Creative thinking,
·
Drawing conclusion and
·
Cooperative skill
Therefore it is ideally
expected that any group of children will undertake a project work with a
perspective of continuous effort of questioning and experimentation (as in
fig-1).
Here, observation
incorporates anything the children observe in their daily life in the locality,
in relation to the theme defined for the year. The observation should to be
followed by relevant questioning such as “What? Where? When? Why? How?
Whom?”. In the search for finding out the answer to the question(s),
one is required to review different literature concerning
the issues in the study. Review of such literature basically and ideally helps
in framing the steps towards the study and experimentation. In the process, one
may also discuss with experts of the relevant fields to get information
and advice. Initiatives for such activities must be encouraged by the
guide associated with the project. These steps will help to frame
assumption/hypothesis. Hypothesis is an assumption of some causes and
its impact on the basis of observation, information collected from different
literature and emerged from discussion with experts. After these phases, actual
study through survey or experimentation or survey followed by
experimentation would start. In the case of survey-based
work, identification of respondent, their unit of observation, sample
coverage, design of survey in relation to designing of interview schedule or
questionnaire is supposed to be the most critical steps. Such decisions
may vary with the issues of study. On the other hand, in case of experimentation,
setting the objective of experimentation, defining different parameters,
identification of ideal instruments, framing of procedures/steps and control
along with repetitive observation of the experiments are critical
decisions, which will determine the path towards the result. Again in relation
to issues of study, such experiment may be either laboratory experiments
or field experiments.
It is expected that in
course of time, the children’s project will bring in lots of new information
about problems and prospects of their locality along with innovative ideas to
address these issues. Moreover, in the course of project work, the children may
develop different new approaches of study along with the development of
different instruments for their experiments. Such tools/instruments may be
developed with the material in their access / available to them nearby. Another
expectation was that the outcome of different studies will be communicated
among the local populace, which in turn, helps in generating scientific
temperament among the general mass.
In a nutshell, the CSC projects are simple, innovative, concerned with
local issues related with day to day life, carried out in very nominal cost,
where the focus is more on logical interpretation and analysis of issues, and
finding out pragmatic solutions of generic nature to the possible extent, and
not merely confined to the study topic and corresponding model making.
1.3.
Objectives
The primary objectives of
the Children’s Science Congress is to make a forum available to children of the
age-group of 10-17 years, both from formal school system as well as from out of
school, to exhibit their creativity and innovativeness and more particularly
their ability to solve a societal problem experienced locally using the method
of-science.
By implication, the CSC prompts children to think of some significant
societal problem, ponder over its causes and subsequently try and solve the
same using the scientific process. This involves close and keen observation,
raising pertinent questions, building models, predicting solutions on the basis
of a model, trying out various possible alternatives and arriving at an optimum
solution using experimentation, field work, research and innovative ideas. The
Children’s Science Congress encourages a sense of discovery. It emboldens the
participants to question many aspects of our progress and development and
express their findings in vernacular.
1.4.
Relevance
of CSC in the light of
contemporary educational initiatives
The
basic approach of CSC on the
principle of learning through doing on the issues of children’s immediate
environment significantly caries the sprit and mandate of Education for
Sustainable Development (ESD) of UNESCO, National Curriculum Framework
(NCF,2005) and Right to Education(RTE,2009).
The
modalities and approaches of CSC
cater to the five pillars of learning of Education for Sustainable Development
vividly, viz. learning to know, learning to do, learning to live together, and
learning to be, learning to transform one self and society (Declaration of ESD
in the 57th meeting of the United Nations General
Assembly in December 2002, which proclaimed the UN Decade of Education for Sustainable Development, 2005- 2014, refer – www.desd.org and www.unesco.org)
The
mandate of CSC which encourage
Children’s to observe, explore, experiments and wonder through a project
activities and its associated ways of participation and evaluation rightly take
care of the guiding principles of the NCF,2005. Therefore, example of Children’s
Science Congress is rightly cited in the NCF documents under executive summery
section, page ix (http://www.teindia.nic.in/Files/NCF-2005.pdf) .
Similarly
CSC activities also helps in
materializing the approach of learning as framed in the Right of Children of
Free and Compulsory Education (RTE) Act, 2005 (particularly in relation to
article 6.1, section C (ii, iii, iv and v)).
More
over the CSC activities, since
1993, has catered to many of the approaches and priorities of science education
visualized in the National Programme of Sarba Siksha Abhijan (SSA) (refer SSA
framework, htp//ssakarnataka.gov.in/pdfs/aboutus/ ssa_framework%20.pdf) and
Rastriya Madhamik Siskha Abhijan (RMSA) ( refer - http://www.educationforallinindia.com/rastriya-madhymic-shiksha-mission-RMSM.pdf).
1.5.
Eligibility
of participants
·
It is open for children in the age of 10 to 14 years (lower age
group) and from 14+ to 17 years (upper age group) as on December 31 of the
calendar year.
·
A group of children not
exceeding five, can do the project –study under a teacher guide.
·
A child scientist, who had
already presented as a Group Leader at the National Level in one age-group, can
act as a co-worker in the subsequent year, in the same age group (lower / upper).
·
Parents, whose child would
participate in the Children’s Science Congress in the ensuing year, should not
hold any portfolio in the organizing committee of the CSC
conducted at any level.
1.6.
Modalities
of participation
Following are major steps involved for participation in the CSC
1.7.
Nature
of CSC Project
The
CSC projects are:
·
Innovative, simple and
practical;
·
Representing teamwork;
·
Based on exploration of
everyday life-situations;
·
Involving Experimentation
and/or field based data collection;
·
Having definite outputs,
arrived through scientific methodology;
·
Related directly to
community work in the local geographical area;
·
Having follow-up plans.
1.8.
Criteria
of Good Projects
As per past experience it has been found that
projects which were rated very good had the following elements while
implementing and documenting the project:
·
Proper understanding and
definition of the problem undertaken.
·
Quality and quantity of
work, including team work, learning process, subject understanding and efforts
to validate the data collected.
·
Relevance of the proposal to
the community/school problem and impact of project on schoolmates,
neighbourhood community.
·
Originality, innovation and
creativity shown to understand the problem and find solution i.e. in
methodology and experiment design.
1.9.
Points
to remember
The
project work of CSC must be
carried out in a systematic way so that it can rightly reflect the method of
science in the works. The issue of the study may demand experimental or survey
works or both. In case of experimental works design and principle of the
experiments are very important factor which may help to get a better result in
a rational way. In such case parameters of observation and verification through
the experiment and its logical selection must be reflected vividly along with
sets of control and approaches of data validation. Similarly, in case of survey
based project universe of the study, criteria of sample selection, sample
coverage, design of questionnaire or interview schedule are very important along
with approaches of data compilation, validation, analysis and interpretation.
Prototype model or functional models are only encouraged to use in project
presentation if issues and methods of study really demands for it.
Log-Book- Proper work diary has to be maintained while
carrying out the project work. The day-to-day activity has to be neatly noted
in the form of a log-book, and should be submitted with the project report at
the time of submission. All the details, such as Project title, name of the
group leader etc should be written clearly on the cover.
1.10. Structure of the project
report
The
structure project report of CSC is
as follow
i. Cover
page – must incorporate
·
Title of the project
·
Name and address of Group
leader and co-workers
·
Name and address of guide
ii. Form
– A ( Registration form)
iii. Abstract
– in 250 words for lower age group and 300 words upper age group (one copy in English)
iv. Contents-
list of chapter with detail heading and sub-heading, list of table, chart,
maps, etc. along with references against page numbers
v. Introduction-
description on background of the study
vi. Aims
and objectives of the study
vii. Hypothesis
viii.
Need statement
ix. Work
plan
x. Methodology
xi. Observations
xii. Data
analysis and interpretation
xiii.
Results
xiv. Conclusions
xv. Solution
to the problem
xvi. Future
plan
xvii.
Acknowledgement
xviii.
References
|
1.11. Oral presentation:
Oral
presentation at the technical sessions of the congress is a very important
component of the entire process. Effective communication during briefing the
issues of study, its objectives, and methodology adopted for the study,
important observation and findings, vital aspects on the way and approach to
solve the problem or address problems is a very critical part of the exercise.
Because only 8 minutes time is allotted for the purpose. Therefore, one has to
plan pragmatically for the purpose. Children can use 4 different posters (which
is mandatory). Poster must be prepared on 55 cm x 70 cm (21.6" x
27.5") drawing sheets (i.e. chart papers). If needed power point
presentation may be used.
Your
posters should contain information on (1) The project title, (2) Names of the
group members, (3) Objectives, (4) Map of the area, (5) Methodology, (6)
Results, (7) Conclusion, (8) Solution to the problem. Depending upon the nature
of the project the poster may or may not have a map and/or results.
1.12. Different level of Congress
Children’s
Science Congress is organised in three levels where
the child scientists and their project works are screened under common
evaluation criteria. The
evaluation of the project is done for its innovativeness,
simplicity and practicality. On the basis of the merit of the project is
selected for the next level. The three levels are as follows:
·
Block /district level
·
State level
·
National level.
The District/Block level Congress is the first level in which projects
compete with one another and are screened for presentation at the State level Congress, the second level.
Projects as per State-wise quota indicated at Annexure-
are selected from the State level for the Grand Finale – the National Children’s Science Congress.
Seven to eight lakh child scientists participate at various levels from the
States and the Union
Territories
1.13. Screening
(i) The
selection ratio at District/State Level and at State/National Level should be
as follows:
State: District = 1: 15
(Out
of 15 projects presented at District 1 will be screened for State Level.)
(ii) State/National
= As per State quota indicated at Annexure -
(iii) The
selection ratio of Lower age group (10 to 14 years of age) to Upper age group
(14+ to 17 years) should be 40:60.
1.14. Tentative Activity Schedule
·
Selection of subjects and
activity for registration of teams : June-July
·
Working on the project:
Minimum two months
·
District level Congress: By September
-October
·
State level Congress: By
November
·
National level Congress:
27-31 December
·
‘Kishore Vigyani Sanmmelan’
( at Indian Science Congress ) from 3-7 January
1.15. Approaches of Evaluation
The
innovative ideas and scientific methodology are the basis of a good project but
one has to prove his communication skills also to make others listen and
understand his findings. For doing this, a total cooperation in the group is a
must. Accept positive criticism within the group or even from outside and
improve the work plan. This will bring award and recognition.
1.15.1.
Evaluation
Criteria
i)
Originality
of idea and concept: A unique or novel project
idea which attempts to answer a specific question - (a hypothesis driven by
curiosity to understand any concept related to focal theme). The idea should
not be an exact replication of the model projects as in this Activity Guide. A
proper explanation of origin of the idea may be demanded by the evaluator.
ii)
Relevance
of the project to the theme: This section focuses on
how the project is relevant to the focal theme/sub-theme.
iii)
Scientific
understanding of the issue: Refers to the extent of
knowledge the child scientist has in relation to the project idea.
iv)
Data
collection: Systematic collection of information using
relevant tools/interviews/questionnaire. Sample size should be sufficient to
support the issues under study.
v)
Analysis:
This includes tabulation, categorization/classification, and simple statistics
as applicable to the study.
vi)
Experimentation/Scientific
study/validation: Conducting of experiments/field study
and validation applying simple methods of science. Experiment need not be every
sophisticated or lab based, they could be simple, self developed and
inexpensive too.
vii)
Interpretation
and Problem solving attempt: To what extent the team
has addressed the proposed hypothesis and the issue of the locality through the
project.
viii)
Team
work: It refers to work division, cooperation and
sharing among and beyond the team members (the child scientists).
ix)
Background
correction (Only for District level): In
this case the background of the children is verified like geographical location
of their school, village, town etc. in relation to infrastructure, information
and other input related facilities available with them. The logic is that
children from difficult geographical situation must get some weightage in
comparison to the children from advantageous geographical location. Non-school
going children should also get some weightage in this criterion.
x)
Report
and Presentation: Written Report and Oral Presentation
are evaluated separately. Reports are evaluated for its systematic
presentation, tabulation of data in support of the project idea and the clarity
with which the study is documented and explained. A Log Book (actually a Daily
Diary) is mandatory and should be authenticated over the signature of the guide
teacher daily. The cover page of the Log Book should carry the names of the
child scientists, the district and the Sate, in English. Marks awarded for the
presentation covers question and answer with evaluators, presentation of
charts/posters, illustrations and other visuals.
xi)
Follow
up Action Plan (Only for State and National levels):
The child scientists should try to find out scientific solution to the
bothering problem. Has the team conveyed the message to the community? How it
was communicated? Will effort continue to involve more people till the problem
is solved? Was any action plan suggested? Credit shall be given for similar
efforts.
xii)
Improvement
from the previous level (Only for State and National levels):
This is to encourage the child scientists towards their continuous involvement
with the project for its improvement. Improvements on the work from District to
state level and then from State level to the national level will be given marks
separately. The evaluators shall specify the areas of improvement on a separate
sheet of paper.
xiii)
Additional
page(s): These must be there in the Project Report
with detail description of works of improvement done after the previous level
(particularly on the basis of the evaluators’ suggestion in the previous level).
1.15.2.
Evaluators
i)
Evaluators may please note
that the participating children are budding scientists from the age group of 10
to 17 years with limited access to knowledge centres and therefore require
encouragement. Having understood their capabilities and capacities, the
evaluators should provide them with constructive inputs and positive feed-back.
ii)
Evaluators should appreciate
and value the efforts, innovativeness and confidence of the participating child
scientists and ensure that their honest assessment work as a guiding light for
future endeavours of the child scientists and each one goes back motivated,
intellectually rich and more confident.
iii)
Evaluators should evaluate
the projects on the basis of subject matter and scientific content and are not
influenced by the gadgetry used or oratory skills of the participants. They should
avoid unwarranted comments and also avoid comparing the works of the child
scientists with those carried out by senior members or scientists.
iv)
Evaluators should avoid
being any source of distraction to the child scientists while presentation is
going on and do not take the interactions with the participants as a test what
the participating child does not know, rather, they make efforts to know what
the child scientist know about the subject area.
1.15.3.
Model
consolidated Evaluation Sheet
For District level
|
Sl. No.
|
Criteria
|
Max. marks
|
Written Report
|
Oral Presentation
|
Total
|
|
1.
|
Originality of idea and concept
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
2.
|
Relevance of the project to the
theme
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
3.
|
Understanding of the issue
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
4.
|
Data collection & analysis
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
5.
|
Experimentation/validation
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
6.
|
Interpretation and Problem solving
attempt
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
7.
|
Team work
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
8.
|
Background correction
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
9.
|
Oral presentation/ written report
(as applicable)
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total:
|
100
|
|
|
|
For State Level
|
Sl. No.
|
Criteria
|
Max. marks
|
Written Report
|
Oral Presentation
|
Total
|
|
1.
|
Originality of idea and concept
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
2.
|
Relevance of the project to the
theme
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
3.
|
Understanding of the issue
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
4.
|
Data collection & analysis
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
5.
|
Experimentation/validation
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
6.
|
Interpretation and Problem solving
attempt
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
7.
|
Team work
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
8.
|
Follow up action plan
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
9.
|
Oral presentation/ written report
(as applicable)
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
10.
|
Improvement over the previous level
suggested
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total:
|
100
|
|
|
|
1.16. Organisers
NCSC is organised nationally
by the National Council for Science and Technology Communication (NCSTC),
Department of Science and Technology Government of India, with active support
from NCSTC-Network as a national co-ordinating Agency. NCSTC-Network is a
registered Society, comprising
of 76 organisations (Annexure-), Government and
Non-Government, spread over all the states and Union Territories of
India, who are working for science popularization. To organise CSC at the State Level, each State/Union Territory
has a coordinating body viz. State Co-ordinating Agency, which is a member of
the NCSTC-Network (see list at Annexure- ).
1.16.1.
Role
of District Coordinating Agency, District Coordinators and District Academic
Coordinators
i)
To agree in writing, on
being selected, to act as a District Coordinating Agency and abide by rules and
regulations prescribed in this Activity Guide Book and also by the State
Coordinating Agency;
ii)
To constitute a District
Organizing Committee (DOC) and a
District Academic Committee (DAC) , minimum 7 (seven) members can be selected from teachers, activists, ex-child scientists,
government officials, officials of the local bodies etc. and send the lists to
the State Coordinator by the date specified. The District Coordinators shall
act as the Member-Secretary of both the Committees;
iii)
To register groups of
children (2 to 5 in one group) in Form A and provide them with necessary
reference materials, kits and guidance. Number of groups registered to be intimated
to the State Coordinator by the date specified;
iv)
While registering the
District Co-ordinator should be assured that, the age of the child scientist
falls within the age as on 31st December of the calendar year. If
need be a copy of the age-certificate may be retained by the District
Co-ordinator, to avoid any confusion at later stages. Even while participating
at the National Congress, the State Co-ordinator may also keep a copy of the
certificate.
v)
To select schools from rural
and urban area in an equal ratio;
vi)
To organise District level
Teachers’ Orientation Workshops with the help of the State Coordinators;
vii)
To interact with local
scientist and arrange for their periodic interaction with the registered group
of children, if required;
viii)
Try to involve at least 50 schools and 250
numbers of project in the district including those from informal education
system
ix)
Organize District level Congress, Orientation
of Evaluators in consultation with the State Coordinators;
x)
To submit Feed-back Reports
on all activities, containing names of schools and number of projects at
district level and follow up action taken on projects likely to become part of
community action, photocopies of all Registration/Attendance Sheets for all
Workshops/Meetings, Evaluation Sheets in original, samples of certificates
issued, mementos presented to child scientists, photo-documentation etc.
related to CSC at the District
level to the State Coordinator in the manner and by the date specified;
xi)
To maintain a Bank Account
and maintain Accounts at the District level and submit an audited Receipts
& Payment Account to the State Coordinators by the date and in the manner
specified;
xii)
To maintain infrastructural
facilities, including electronic communication facility such as internet
connectivity, fax etc.
xiii)
To arrange
review and mentoring of the projects selected for presentation at the State
Level NCSC.
1.16.2.
Role
of State Coordinating Agency, State Coordinators and State Academic
Coordinators
The State Coordinating
Agency shall have the overall responsibility for the implementation of NCSC at
the State level. The specific responsibilities shall be –
i)
Constitute a State Organizing Committee (SOC) and a State Academic Committee (SAC) where minimum
7 (seven) members to be selected from teachers,
activists, ex-child scientists, government officials, officials of the local
bodies, Network members in the State and other non-Network organizations
specifically active in a region in the State, where the State Coordinating
Agency does not have a reach). Submit the list of SOC, SAC, DOC and DAC along
with project proposal for districts and state. The State Coordinators shall act
as the Member-Secretary of both the Committees;
ii)
To constitute Regional
Coordinators, if found necessary in case of big States and to involve SCERT,
DIET, IRIS and organizations working with handicapped children/elder citizens
and media representatives. Distribution of geographical area for organizational
purposes etc. will be the prerogative of the State Coordinators;
iii)
To locate individuals,
schools specially interested in other curricular activities;
iv)
To select District
Coordinating Agencies and obtain consent letter from the respective
organization, where they have to agree to abide by the guideline of CSC and
willing to follow the guideline of NCSTC,DST; NCSTC – Network and respective
State Coordinating agency of the state.
v)
Organise Orientation Workshops of District
Coordinators and teachers with the help of subject experts;
vi)
To coordinate translation of
the Activity Guide Book to be used by the children, in local language and make
them available to the District Coordinators;
vii)
To maintain a Bank Account
and maintain Accounts at the State level and submit an audited Receipts &
Payment Account to the funding agencies within three months of the date of
event with a Project Completion Report and a Utilization Certificate in the
manner prescribed;
viii)
To submit Feed-back Reports
on all activities, samples of certificates issued, mementos presented to child
scientists, photo-documentation etc. related to CSC
at the State level to the funding agency in the manner and by the date
specified;
ix)
To remit funds to District
Coordinating Agencies by account payee cheques;
x)
To form linkages with
Testing and Monitoring facilities available in the State (with NGOs as well as
Government), Municipal Corporations and other local bodies etc. to help
children in better implementation (information collection/sample testing) of
their activities( Identity Cards may be issued to children registered for
activities) through District Coordinators/State Coordinator;
xi)
To arrange review and mentoring
of the projects selected for presentation at the NCSC.
xii)
To ensure that Evaluation
sheets, both written and oral are forwarded to the next higher level, i.e. from
district to State and from State to National level, else the district / State
contingent might not be registered during State/National level CSC .
xiii)
State Academic Coordinators
should work in close association with the district/State Coordinators for
arranging evaluation process and shall make an effort to send one member from
State Academic Committee as an Observer to the district level CSC . His/her signature on the selection list is
mandatory. The entire process of evaluation is to be supervised by the
Observer. Decision of the State Academic Committee shall be final word on the
selection.
1.16.3.
Note
for State Coordinators and District Coordinators
i)
The age limits for
participation must not be less than 10 years and more than 17 years on December
31 of the year.
ii)
Relatives of District Coordinators,
District Academic Coordinators, State Coordinators and State Academic
Coordinators will not be selected for National CSC .
They may leave the post for the year if participation of the ward is desired.
iii)
Any child will not
participate more than twice in national CSC
as Group Leader – once from each age group.
iv)
Two selected projects (one
from lower age group and one from upper age group) from each state to ‘Kishor Vigyani Sanmelayan’ of Indian
Science Congress held every year during January 3-7.
v)
Technology Entrepreneurship
Promotion Program selected CSC
projects meeting the following criteria may apply for support under this
program –
· The
idea should be new/novel,
· The
idea should have potentiality for translating it into working model/ prototype/process,
· The
idea should be based on known scientific principle,
· The
idea should have commercial feasibility/ technical viability.
vi)
Proposals from individual
innovators to convert an original idea / invention / know-how into working
prototype / processes. These proposals can be made by individuals or jointly
with any sponsoring organizations.
Selected
projects will be provided by financial support to undertake the above
developments, patent support and guidance, scientific / technical consultancy,
fabrication assistance, market information and networking with related research
lab/ institutes as required. For detailed information you may contact: Techno-entrepreneur Promotion Programme,
Ministry of Science & Technology, Post Bag No. 66,
Hauz Khas, New Delhi
For further
detail one may contact
Dr B.P. Singh
Head, NCSTC
Dr D. K. Pandey
Scientist E
and
National Programme
Coordinator of NCSC
National Council for Science and
Technology Communication (NCSC),
Department of Science and Technology
Technology Bhavan, New Mehrauli Road , New
Delhi
Email ID: dkp@nic.in;
Telephone no:01126535564/26590251
Prof.
S.P. Verma
Chairperson,
NCSTC-Network
Email-
verma1946@gmail.com
Mr
R.S. Raghuvanshi
General
Secretary, NCSTC Network
NCSTC-Network
, E-56, Pandav Nagar, New Delhi
Email
– ncstcnetwork@gmail.com
ncstcnet@hotmail.com
Telephone
– 011-22799236
Or
State Coordinator of the Respective State
கருத்துகள் இல்லை:
கருத்துரையிடுக